Skip to content

adulis-review.pages.dev

Adulis Review

Case AR-2026-002

Verdict: Misleading

Did Eritrea “not deny” that its troops had crossed into Ethiopia?

By Editorial Desk — Published

The claim

Claim · The National2026-10-08Archived ✓

Eritrea did not deny its troops had crossed the border.

Our finding

Case AR-2026-002

Verdict

Misleading

The National reported flatly that Eritrea did not deny its troops had crossed the border. That is true of one social media post by Eritrea's information minister, but Reuters reported the same day that he denied Eritrean forces were there and accused Ethiopia of fabricating allegations. Leaving that out gives readers the impression Eritrea tacitly accepted the reports.

Misleading: The claim contains some factually accurate elements, but omits essential context, misattributes, conflates separate events, or presents information in a way that leads a reasonable reader to a false conclusion. How we decide

What was claimed

On 8 October, The National reported that Eritrean troops had entered Tigray and wrote: “Eritrea did not deny its troops had crossed the border.” The only Eritrean response it cited was a post on X by the information minister, Yemane Gebremeskel, accusing Ethiopia of building “a fallacious narrative of ‘self defence’”.

What Eritrea said

Eritrea’s response came in more than one form, and the reports differ depending on which one they used.

In a Reuters report published on 7 October, the minister “denied Eritrean forces were there, calling the witness accounts part of an Ethiopian plan to justify a war of aggression against its smaller neighbor”. The same report quotes him directly: Ethiopia “has tried to re-package this war agenda in terms of self-defense by fabricating various allegations against Eritrea.” We have kept a screenshot of that paragraph .

A later version of the Reuters story, based on the minister’s post on X, says that statement “did not deny that troops had crossed the border” . The Associated Press described the same post as accusing Ethiopia of fabricating allegations, and said the minister “did not specifically address” the troop movements .

So both things are true at once. The minister’s post on X did not deal with the crossing directly. But in remarks reported by Reuters on the same day, he denied Eritrean forces were in Adigrat and called the allegations fabricated.

What the claim leaves out

The National’s sentence is accurate about the minister’s post on X. It is not accurate as a description of Eritrea’s response as a whole. Stated without qualification, and without the denial Reuters reported, it leads a reader to conclude that Eritrea had effectively accepted that its troops crossed the border. The record does not support that conclusion.

This fact check is about how Eritrea’s response was reported. It is not a finding on whether Eritrean troops are in Tigray, which remains unconfirmed by independent sources.

Our verdict

Misleading. Eritrea’s information minister denied, in remarks reported by Reuters, that Eritrean forces were in Adigrat, and accused Ethiopia of fabricating allegations. Reporting that Eritrea “did not deny” the crossing, without that context, gives a false impression of Eritrea’s position.

Exhibits

6 items
  1. A

    Report

    The National, 8 October 2026: states that “Eritrea did not deny its troops had crossed the border” and cites the minister's post on X. It reports no other Eritrean response.

    thenationalnews.com ↗
  2. B

    Report

    Reuters, published by Arab News, 7 October 2026: “Eritrea's information minister Yemane Gebremeskel denied Eritrean forces were there.” Quotes him saying Ethiopia “has tried to re-package this war agenda in terms of self-defense by fabricating various allegations against Eritrea”.

    arabnews.com ↗
  3. C

    Image

    Screenshot of the Reuters report as published by Arab News, taken 9 October 2026, showing the paragraph reporting the minister's denial.

    adulis-review.pages.dev ↗
  4. D

    Report

    Reuters, published by Al Jazeera, 7 October 2026: a later version of the story says the minister's statement on X “did not deny that troops had crossed the border”.

    aljazeera.com ↗
  5. E

    Report

    Associated Press, 8 October 2026: says the minister accused Ethiopia of fabricating allegations and “did not specifically address the movements” reported by a conflict monitor.

    usnews.com ↗
  6. F

    Image

    Screenshot of The National's article, taken 9 October 2026.

    adulis-review.pages.dev ↗
Exhibit A · Report

The National, 8 October 2026: states that “Eritrea did not deny its troops had crossed the border” and cites the minister's post on X. It reports no other Eritrean response.

thenationalnews.com ↗In the exhibits ↓

Exhibit B · Report

Reuters, published by Arab News, 7 October 2026: “Eritrea's information minister Yemane Gebremeskel denied Eritrean forces were there.” Quotes him saying Ethiopia “has tried to re-package this war agenda in terms of self-defense by fabricating various allegations against Eritrea”.

arabnews.com ↗In the exhibits ↓

Exhibit C · Image

Screenshot of the Reuters report as published by Arab News, taken 9 October 2026, showing the paragraph reporting the minister's denial.

adulis-review.pages.dev ↗In the exhibits ↓

Exhibit D · Report

Reuters, published by Al Jazeera, 7 October 2026: a later version of the story says the minister's statement on X “did not deny that troops had crossed the border”.

aljazeera.com ↗In the exhibits ↓

Exhibit E · Report

Associated Press, 8 October 2026: says the minister accused Ethiopia of fabricating allegations and “did not specifically address the movements” reported by a conflict monitor.

usnews.com ↗In the exhibits ↓

Exhibit F · Image

Screenshot of The National's article, taken 9 October 2026.

adulis-review.pages.dev ↗In the exhibits ↓

Record of events

2026-10-07Witnesses tell Reuters they saw Eritrean soldiers in Adigrat. Reuters reports that Eritrea's information minister denied Eritrean forces were there.
2026-10-07A later Reuters version, based on the minister's post on X, says he did not deny that troops had crossed.
2026-10-08Claim published by The National.
2026-10-08The National publishes its report.
2026-10-09This review published.

Type to search the record.